The researcher made sure the students were ready to learn and gave attention to the researcher’s explanation then helped the students as they learning.
The action that the researcher did in this stage was more effective than the previous cycle. This stage was consisted of three meetings. The action of this research was conducted by applying world café strategy based on the revised plan. There were some revisions in the cycle 2 the researcher asked students to bring dictionary, gave some interesting topic and would more paid attention to the effectiveness of the teaching and learning in the classroom.
Observation checklist and field notes were also designed based on the learning strategy of this research. The researcher also prepared the speaking test for the students after the strategy was implemented. The researcher prepared the lesson plan about spoof text to give some interesting topic to the students. The researcher made some revision in the cycle 2 which helped by the collaborator. This step was based on the reflection of the cycle 1. The result of this reflection was taken as a consideration to plan the nex for the next cycle. Through this reflection researcher identified the causes that made this method is less successful, and researcher plan the way to repair the unsuccessful thing in cycle 1. It was done by collaborator.įor this step, students’ improvement in speaking of the cycle 1 collected and analyzed to measure the success level of the implementation of cycle 1. It conducted in teaching and learning process. The instrument for observation activities were observation checklist and field note that were made base on lesson plan. The researcher facilitated the students concludes about todays topic.Īn observation was about what were happening in the classroom activities were done in this stage. The researcher asked the students to perfom individually in front of the class. The researcher monitored the process that will be continued for several movements. The researcher gave the students a topic to discuss. The researcher facilitated the students form random groups of four. The researcher taught the students about today’s topic. The researcher prepared some interview questions for interview at the end of cycle. The researcher prepared observation checklist and field note form for checklist while implementing world cafe strategy. The researcher prepared some speaking exercise that was done by the students during world cafe strategy. The researcher wrote a lesson plan of world cafe strategy for speaking activity. There were four steps of the research plan, action, observe and reflect. The procedure of this research was based on Kemmis in O’Brien (2001) theory. The researcher used the structure interview which the researcher written some questions that must be answered for the students. In this research, the interview was used to know the effectiveness using the strategy in the classroom by the teacher and also to know the students’ responses of using world café strategy through some question. Interview is a way in collecting the qualitative data (Sukidin et al, 2002).
The result of this observation checklist and field notes was used by the researcher to revise in the next cycle. Sorabel M.Pd as the research collaborator in this research helped the researcher fulfill the observation checklist & field notes. This scale can be used to know the clear answer. Riduwan (2004:90) stated that Guttman scale is a cumulative scale which only has two answers, yes or no. The researcher used Guttman scale in the teacher and students’ observation sheet. While, the students’ observation checklist & field notes also consist of questions items which used to identify and collect the improvement of the students in applying the strategy. This instrument consist of questions items that covers all of the teaching aspects such us the way teacher explained the material, the teacher’s classroom management and etc. The teacher’s observation checklist & field notes were used to identify and collect the improvement of the researcher in applying the strategy. There were two kinds of observation checklist & field notes in this research teacher’s observation checklist & field notes and students’ observation checklist & field notes. To ensure the reliability of the score, there were two scorers, the researcher herself and the collaborator. They had to speak in good accuracy and fluency. The test was done by asking the students to speak orally.
The using of instrument test in this research would find the students’ speaking ability progress in each cycle. Test is a way to know the students’ ability and force by asking the students through some questions in order to measure the students’ ability (Arikunto,1991). There were three instruments of the research to collect data : test, observation checklist and field notes, and interview.